![]() ![]() The Skylum web site also has issues – download URLs do not work despite being supplied to me from Skylum support (I tried in Mozilla Firefox as well as Microsoft Edge, both current production).Ĭleaning the sensor on a Z9 is not the same as others Nikon USA claims that only Nikon USA service should clean the Z9 sensor. Note that PL6 and Serif Affinity 2 both do not have this issue – if MS Win File Explorer (MSFE) can “see” the file, so can either of these and either can output to the same directory (folder) that MSFE can access – but not so for LN as of now. LN crashed and would not reopen when it attempted to use images stored on a network, requiring a full re-installation. At present, LN cannot function if the image files are in a local (not “cloud”) network accessed directory tree – what are termed network shared folders on MS Win. Since then, a number of issues have surfaced with LN and these are the first images I have been able to process. The previous LN output I posted was from using it in the field on a laptop. My personal initial impression is that the PL6E has less noise, better detail, and somewhat better general rendition than LN with the amount of work I invested (DeepPRIME XD does a good job for a “first pass”). ![]() Both workflow applications have my presets, not “stock”. These are the low resolution JPEG uncropped from the Z9 (I generally take both a NEF and a low resolution JPEG, the latter for rapid transmission to a client without post as well as for reviewing in situations when there is no raw viewer that can handle the specific NEF format), the result from PL6E DeepPRIME XD, and Skylum Luminar Neo (LN). I am attaching JPEG images, all from the same Z9 lossless compressed NEF image – all my copyright. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |